Well im back with another conspiracy theory, and this one may get me locked up in a padded cell, but i refuse to be gagged, ill do my best to uphold the consiprasists code of never shutting up!
Lady Gaga errks me, i can forgive a young girl acting stupid, or a spoilt brat acting like a spoilt brat but Gaga is something else, she annoys me like a grown man using paint by numbers, or a kid throwing a tantrum in a supermarket because mum wont add the Milo to the shopping cart.
The conspiracy you may ask ? That Lady Gaga is a fictionary character created to sell records, a young girl lured into a music executive's limmo with a bag of candy ...
Gaga version 2.1 as she will now be known, is nothing but a cyborg, assembeled by music executives, here is the recipe ...
Ingerdients:
1x young vain girl with ambitions out weighing integrity
2x money hungry parents
2x music executives (with car rental until 1st single is released)
1x music producer with an auto produce button on his computer
1x stylist ? Oops did i say stylist ? 1x porn producer
15x kids to inflate ego
Method:
1. Take 2 music executives and mix with money hungry parents and stir
2. Add young girl without integrity and let sit for a week
3. Allow Gaga 2.1 to sit with music producer for 24 hours
4. Add a topping of porn sized proportions ....
5. 15 groupies then added to ensure ultimate ego is grown
Result:
You tell me ... a b or c ?
a. Fraud
b. A CONSPIRACY WORTH POSTING!
c. A 26 year old skunk who grew up too fast and needs to grouch less!
Ill pay anyone who doesnt answer with "c" ....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have another thory, she's not real at all. She's a pixel perfect digital image that's subliminally charged by the music industry. Think, she made 1 album and the media is making each song a one hit wonder week by week. When was the last time all of America fell in love over and over? Plus if you watch the videos she's never really touching anyone, she's kinds photoshopped in. Just a thought to ponder next time " watch and discuss" pops up on vh1 with a lady gaga video flashing in the background.
ReplyDeletewhat is it with u skunkers..??
ReplyDeletehave u ever stopped to think that lady gaga is on the right side of the media revelution ???
how and where u got the courage to say she is all processed and zero talent should embarress you all
this girls has spent the past few years watchin britney spears take credit for her lyrics that she wrote as the producers told her there waz no interest in her due to her non "perfect" features! shes the one who wrote britneys lyrics but was never aloud to perform herself
secondly lady gaga designs AND MAKES all of her own clothes
this woman is an example to modern day artists, living prove that true talent and dedication pays off!
so if she is the pixelated wonder as u all suggest in ur paranoid speeches , please enlighten me as to why gaga REFUSES to mime and always sings live??
i think u have not even properli adressed the issue of gaga
she is the new andy warhol!!!
everyone thought he was nuts too
i suggest u actualli research into the haus of gaga or mail her seen as though she one of the onli artists that talks to her fans or in this case paranoid hyperactive doubters....
you are the ones being fooled by who ever is fuellin these outrages thoughts.... u cant even spot wen sumone is helping YOU out!!
Lady Gaga did not spend YEARS watching Britney Spears using her songs. She wrote ONE song for Britney and only in the past two years has she been working with Akon/Redone. In fact, just a couple of years ago, she wrote and EP called 'Red and Blue' and her music was VERY different, almost FOLKY. So, I would suggest that you, anonymous do your research properly instead of blindly following what the media has made us all believe----SAVIOR of pop. Part sellout, part gimic and ALL commercial. She admits all of it and plays the game.
ReplyDeleteHear, hear!!
ReplyDeleteOk first of all, this Lady Gaga maybe a good remixed singer, but in live, she sound NOTHING like her songs potray her voice to be. If you really think she is so good, then why don't you go dress like her? This too much flesh revealing swimsuit like outfits? The Rolling Stone cover? Hello!And no, she is NOT the saviour of pop. And that you would be so straightforward as to call us "skunkers." A little tip, you need help with your spelling. So let it be known that LADY GAGA HAS NO TALENT.
ReplyDeletelady gaga is a satanist, the song paparrazi is a song sung to the devil trading her soul for fortune and fame
ReplyDeleteI, for example am nobody special. I don't listen to lady gaga OR have ANY interest in her or her songs.
ReplyDeleteCouple of months ago, I was curious about the song that all of us are known to as "Alejandro", so I googled alejandro lyrics, and found a site (I think it's called song meanings, or something similar, I am not really sure) that was showing the lyrics of the songs, particular case "Alejandro", and users were allowed to comment about that song's meaning. There were A LOT of comments, and I read a lot of them.
I was fascinated!
I think that a band like Metallica or Linkin Park, or any, couldn't write a song that would get that type of comments.
What am I talking about:
There are three names in that song: Alejandro, Roberto and Fernando (whoever they are...) and people were writing that song's meanings. Those comments/posts went from meaning that Fernando, Alejandro and roberto were three random guys from Gaga's last night, through the meaning that those three guys symbolize Gaga's strength, emotions and something else, ALL the way to the meaning that those three guys are actually The Holy Trinity itself!
I would not be fascinated if song was really talking about her drunken night with three guys whose names she couldn't remember, neither would I be fascinated if those three guys are Gaga's this and that, or if Gaga is singing about The Holy Trinity.
I have been fascinated with the fact that Gaga (or whoever) managed to write a song which would cause people to make different meanings in such a huge range, span.
-----
People (Gaga-fans) also say that Gaga is an artist. I would not disagree. She or whoever's "cover" she is is an artist on a great scale. But not in singing, or anything that has any connection with singing or making music videos, but in manipulating the most important group of human race - kids. My little cousin is 8 and she and her classmates listen to Lady Gaga on free time in school! How to stop it?! It's like the world is bullying my little cousin.
And what kind of a MAN on this planet would be in Lady Gaga's music video wearing high heels?!
And she is swallowing rosary wearing a latex nun clothing?!
What the FK?! She is a FKing abomination!
That would offend even tha atheists!
Thank you for letting me share this, and thank you for reading my opinion.
Cheers!